Here is my current Hardy desktop Okay...cut me some slack. With a name like Hardy Heron, it's hard not to use "hard on" somewhere. ;)So, as of April 24, 2008, the latest and greatest version of
Ubuntu Linux has been released! I have been stuck on Feisty (
Ubuntu 7.04) for quite some time (I had major issues with Gutsy 7.10) and I was eagerly (
ok, impatiently) waiting for next release. So, how does
Ubuntu Hardy Heron 8.04 measure up? Here's my end-user review:
1. InstallationEasy. That's all I can really say. One of the greatest things about
Ubuntu (and many other
distros) is that it's really easy to install. Just head on over to
download page and pick yourself up a free ISO. I recommend using a
BitTorrent client to download as the servers are quite bogged down (HTTP downloading isn't fun during this time).
Note: Alternatively, if you already have Gutsy or the Heron Release Candidate installed, you can open up your update manager and an option should be available for you to update.As soon as I popped the CD in and restarted, I was greeted with an easy to understand prompt. I made my way to the desktop, which was fully functional, and started to explore. I really like how you can test all of your hardware and play with the software before committing.
Note: It's usually a good idea to test everything while using the LiveCD. That way you can know what hardware works and what doesn't before you install. I tested my wireless, printers, usb devices, etc. Basically, anything I used on a regular basis.
You can also check these sites to see if others have experience (good or bad) with your particular hardware. It can give some insight into whether or not Ubuntu is worth installing, or how much trouble it'll be to correct some potential issues (and fixes for the issues): Ubuntu Hardware Compatibility List and the Ubuntu Wiki HardwareSupport
All I had to do was click the "install" icon on the desktop and that was it. I followed the prompts, which were presented in layman's terms, and the installation took no more than 25 minutes.
Sweet.
2. Boot upI have a weird hiccup while
Ubuntu is initially loading, but nothing that really slows down the overall boot-up process. From a cold start to the desktop, it takes about 1-2 minutes. It's quick enough for me. I didn't see an cryptic messages like I did with Gutsy and the overall process seemed rather smooth. One of my long-time gripes towards
Ubuntu was that its boot up process isn't very professional. Compare it to, say
OpenSUSE's, and it would be put to shame. It's not like it takes away from the experience, but it would be nice to have a little "wow" factor there for new users. Apparently, Intrepid Ibex (
Ubuntu 8.10) is to receive a major visual update, which should include a fancier loading sequence.
3. DesktopHmm...not bad, but not good. In this superficial day and age, the initial desktop seems to be missing something to me. On the plus side, the layout is clean, organized and efficient. I didn't have any trouble finding applications or understanding what was on, say, the panel. But, users that are coming from Windows Vista or Mac OS X Leopard (hell, even Windows
XP maybe) probably won't be impressed (I realize I'm speaking in generalities). I know I wasn't. But, in
Ubuntu's defense (and all other
distros using whatever desktop environment), the desktop is
highly configurable. Don't like the panel? Change it. The icons not your style? Change them. You see where I'm going with this. The user isn't stuck with one particular style. Hell, you can even switch up desktop environments if you want. This is where Linux
distros (not just
Ubuntu) climb above other OSes. The customization factor. With a little hard work, you can have yourself a personal desktop that reflects what you want to see. Ultimately, regardless of whether you decided to change anything or not, the desktop is still geared towards the user. It doesn't confuse the user and everything that an average Joe computer user will need is easy to access and use.
4. SoftwareNote: There are loads more software available in the repos. If you need something, chances are there's a program available. I'm only referring to software that is installed upon a fresh install.I played around with some of the programs installed on Hardy...
Firefox 3.0 Beta 5: I love it. My favorite browser. It's commonly comes installed with Linux
distros. I thought it was interesting that Hardy shipped with a "Beta" quality version of
Firefox, but it seems stable enough for daily use. I didn't have any problems with it and my favorite extensions work with it (
Adblock Plus and
NoScript). The interface now matches your (
gtk2) themes, which brings uniformity and the memory problems seem to be better now. It has improved menus, better
webpage history handling, and a lot of nifty new features and/or eye candy. I especially like the improved download manager. One thing though, sometimes
Firefox seems to freeze for a second or so, but it didn't happen often enough to be problematic.
Brasero: Ah! This CD/DVD burning program is
sweeeeet. Seriously. It's so easy to use, yet powerful enough to do what you want. You can burn images, create
ISOs, make audio and/or date DVDs and
CDs. This program has everything an average user would need. Plus, a no frills interface that is non-intrusive. There's even a little status icon in the notification tray area that tells the progress. Good stuff.
World Clock Applet: This is pretty neat. It contains a calendar, which links to Evolution so you can jot down your activities. It also contains a world map that can tell you the weather forecast and time of a user-set location. It's informative and cool.
5. IssuesObviously, since there's no such thing as perfection, Hardy is not without its issues. Like sky diving without a parachute, there are things about Hardy that aren't pleasant.Nautilus: Maybe it's just me, but what the hell happened here? I love the new progress bars for copying and moving files and/or folders, but why is it so damn slow sometimes? For example, I have a folder that contains about 200
wallpapers (
PNG's and
JPG's).
Every time I open this folder, Nautilus becomes unresponsive and slow. By slow, I mean
slow. I'm always afraid to open folders that contain a large amount of files now. Since Nautilus is such an integral part of GNOME, it becomes somewhat tedious (feel free to correct me if I was wrong about the Nautilus, GNOME connection).
PulseAudio: I'm not exactly aware of why
Ubuntu devs decided to move to
PulseAudio, and while it sounds great, there are things that annoy me about it. With
ALSA, I could have
Firefox open (playing a song from
youtube) and have Totem playing a song. While I understand that the audio would clash, I could at least do it. With
PulseAudio, it denies me the right to have multiple audio programs going at once. For example, If I'm listening to something on
IMEEM with
Firefox and the song is
stopped, I can't open up another music player and start listening to songs without closing
Firefox first...This becomes annoying...fast. Other than that, a small annoyance...The
logout sound doesn't play. The
login and the ready sound play, but not the
logout one. Strange. Besides that poor choice in design (or maybe a flaw with my sound card?) and that minor annoyance,
PulseAudio is good. I just don't know why it's better than
ALSA (could someone explain?).
Flash: Yeah, I know. Doesn't have anything to do with
Ubuntu, Linux or
OpenSource for that matter. It still bugs me that Adobe hasn't released a version that doesn't crash
Firefox.
Bottom LineI'm satisfied with Hardy. It's another virus-free, stable, easy-to-use OS in the
Ubuntu line-up (damn, I used a lot of hyphens in that sentence!). Is 2008 going to be year that
linux takes over the desktop (maybe with Intrepid Ibex *evil laugh*)? No. Is
Ubuntu, along with other popular
distros, helping along the process though? Certainly. With every new release,
Ubuntu becomes even more promising. Ever since I started using
Ubuntu (back in May of 2007), I never thought of it as a "Windows killer" or "a better OS." I chose not to compare OSes. Each has their own strengths and weaknesses. I just rather have a rapidly developing, virus free, customizable, free ($), and stable OS. With a great
community to boot. I was tired of having to re-install Windows
XP. Let's put it this way, if you have the hardware squared away (no compatibility issues or fixes
available) and you're not completely dependent on software available only for Windows (or Mac), then you're good to go. The average user
should be able to listen to music, surf the web, create documents, use email, etc. All of that with relative ease!
Nothing ever seems permanent with
Ubuntu (Linux). If something is broken, chances are there's a fix for it. If I need an alternative program to something Windows has, chances are some kind person has made it (
TuxGuitar comes to mind. I was looking for a
GuitarPro 5 replacement). Hell, if I really want to run Windows applications, I can use
WINE. I love how I don't feel like I have my hands tied behind my back with my OS.
Ubuntu really is something amazing. It can be a hobby, it can be a
community of people enjoying/working on something, or it can just be a tool to help you look at email. Whatever you want!
Ubuntu's flexibility and ability to transcend being just an OS truly astounds me.
Well, I think I've blabbed on for long enough. This is just one end-user's opinion in world filled with opinions.
P.S. I liked to say thank you to all the individuals who took the time and effort to create this awesome OS. Keep up the freaking amazing work and let it be known that your efforts have not been wasted.
P.S.S. If there's anything factually incorrect in my post(s), feel free to correct me. I like learning something new everyday :)